Join MultiplyOpen a Free ShopSign InHelp
MultiplyLogo
SEARCH

Syed Naufal's Site


Subject: As the Arabs see the Jews - His Majesty King Abdullah.


 
Greeting All,
This article, written by King Abdullah, in 1947 is a must read, especially
for all post world war II generation, and for us too lest we forget. Please
forward to the entire world to let the world population know, the history,
the plight and the people behind the current tragedy in Palestine, and to
do any small actions and contribution possible to stop the genocide of the
Palestinians. From being their homeland for more than 2000 years, within 80
years, they are murdered and driven out from their home, cornered into
portions in West Bank and Gaza, or refugees in Jordan and Lebanon, without
being allowed any full self rule, labeled terrorist for fighting for their
rights, and constantly subjected to sanctions, raids and bombing. And all
these being supported by the so called Police of the World, and the
civilized nations of the West. Imagine these happening to our family, our
home, our land, and ourself?? Your support in any small way is being
accounted by the All Mighty.

Summary


This fascinating essay, written by King Hussein's grandfather King Abdullah
in November 1947, appeared in the United States six months before the 1948
Arab-Israeli War. In the article, King Abdullah disputes the mistaken view
that Arab opposition to Zionism (and later the state of Israel) is because
of longstanding religious or ethnic hatred. He notes that Jews and Muslims
enjoyed a long history of peaceful coexistence in the Middle East, and that
Jews have historically suffered far more at the hands of Christian Europe.
Pointing to the tragedy of the holocaust that Jews suffered during World
War II, the monarch asks why America and Europe are refusing to accept more
than a token handful of Jewish immigrants and refugees. It is unfair, he
argues, to make Palestine, which is innocent of anti-Semitism, pay for the
crimes of Europe. King Abdullah also asks how Jews can claim a historic
right to Palestine, when Arabs have been the overwhelming majority there
for nearly 1300 uninterrupted years? The essay ends on an ominous note,
warning of dire consequences if a peaceful solution cannot be found to
protect the rights of the indigenous Arabs of Palestine.


http://www.kinghuss ein.gov.jo/ kabd_eng. html
"As the Arabs see the Jews"
His Majesty King Abdullah,
The American Magazine
November, 1947


I am especially delighted to address an American audience, for the tragic
problem of Palestine will never be solved without American understanding,
American sympathy, American support. So many billions of words have been
written about Palestine?perhaps more than on any other subject in
history?that I hesitate to add to them. Yet I am compelled to do so, for I
am reluctantly convinced that the world in general, and America in
particular, knows almost nothing of the true case for the Arabs.


We Arabs follow, perhaps far more than you think, the press of America. We
are frankly disturbed to find that for every word printed on the Arab side,
a thousand are printed on the Zionist side. There are many reasons for
this. You have many millions of Jewish citizens interested in this
question. They are highly vocal and wise in the ways of publicity. There
are few Arab citizens in America, and we are as yet unskilled in the
technique of modern propaganda. The results have been alarming for us. In
your press we see a horrible caricature and are told it is our true
portrait. In all justice, we cannot let this pass by default.


Our case is quite simple: For nearly 2,000 years Palestine has been almost
100 per cent Arab. It is still preponderantly Arab today, in spite of
enormous Jewish immigration. But if this immigration continues we shall
soon be outnumbered? a minority in our home.


Palestine is a small and very poor country, about the size of your state of
Vermont. Its Arab population is only about 1,200,000. Already we have had
forced on us, against our will, some 600,000 Zionist Jews. We are
threatened with many hundreds of thousands more. Our position is so simple
and natural that we are amazed it should even be questioned. It is exactly
the same position you in America take in regard to the unhappy European
Jews. You are sorry for them, but you do not want them in your country. We
do not want them in ours, either. Not because they are Jews, but because
they are foreigners. We would not want hundreds of thousands of foreigners
in our country, be they Englishmen or Norwegians or Brazilians or whatever.


Think for a moment: In the last 25 years we have had one third of our
entire population forced upon us. In America that would be the equivalent
of 45,000,000 complete strangers admitted to your country, over your
violent protest, since 1921. How would you have reacted to that? Because of
our perfectly natural dislike of being overwhelmed in our own homeland, we
are called blind nationalists and heartless anti-Semites. This charge would
be ludicrous were it not so dangerous. No people on earth have been less
"anti-Semitic" than the Arabs. The persecution of the Jews has been
confined almost entirely to the Christian nations of the West. Jews,
themselves, will admit that never since the Great Dispersion did Jews
develop so freely and reach such importance as in Spain when it was an Arab
possession. With very minor exceptions, Jews have lived for many centuries
in the Middle East, in complete peace and friendliness with their Arab
neighbours.


Damascus, Baghdad, Beirut and other Arab centres have always contained
large and prosperous Jewish colonies. Until the Zionist invasion of
Palestine began, these Jews received the most generous treatment?far, far
better than in Christian Europe. Now, unhappily, for the first time in
history, these Jews are beginning to feel the effects of Arab resistance to
the Zionist assault. Most of them are as anxious as Arabs to stop it. Most
of these Jews who have found happy homes among us resent, as we do, the
coming of these strangers.


I was puzzled for a long time about the odd belief which apparently
persists in America that Palestine has somehow "always been a Jewish
land."
Recently an American I talked to cleared up this mystery. He pointed out
that the only things most Americans know about Palestine are what they read
in the Bible. It was a Jewish land in those days, they reason, and they
assume it has always remained so. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
It is absurd to reach so far back into the mists of history to argue about
who should have Palestine today, and I apologise for it. Yet the Jews do
this, and I must reply to their "historic claim." I wonder if the
world has
ever seen a stranger sight than a group of people seriously pretending to
claim a land because their ancestors lived there some 2,000 years ago!


If you suggest that I am biased, I invite you to read any sound history of
the period and verify the facts. Such fragmentary records as we have
indicate that the Jews were wandering nomads from Iraq who moved to
southern Turkey, came south to Palestine, stayed there a short time, and
then passed to Egypt, where they remained about 400 years. About 1300 BC
(according to your calendar) they left Egypt and gradually conquered
most?but not all?of the inhabitants of Palestine.


It is significant that the Philistines? not the Jews?gave their name to the
country: "Palestine" is merely the Greek form of
"Philistia." Only once,
during the empire of David and Solomon, did the Jews ever control
nearly?but not all?the land which is today Palestine. This empire lasted
only 70 years, ending in 926 BC. Only 250 years later the Kingdom of Judah
had shrunk to a small province around Jerusalem, barely a quarter of modern
Palestine.


In 63 BC the Jews were conquered by Roman Pompey, and never again had even
the vestige of independence. The Roman Emperor Hadrian finally wiped them
out about 135 AD. He utterly destroyed Jerusalem, rebuilt under another
name, and for hundreds of years no Jew was permitted to enter it. A handful
of Jews remained in Palestine but the vast majority were killed or
scattered to other countries, in the Diaspora, or the Great Dispersion.
From that time Palestine ceased to be a Jewish country, in any conceivable
sense.


This was 1,815 years ago, and yet the Jews solemnly pretend they still own
Palestine! If such fantasy were allowed, how the map of the world would
dance about!


Italians might claim England, which the Romans held so long. England might
claim France, "homeland" of the conquering Normans. And the French
Normans
might claim Norway, where their ancestors originated. And incidentally, we
Arabs might claim Spain, which we held for 700 years. Many Mexicans might
claim Spain, "homeland" of their forefathers. They might even claim
Texas,
which was Mexican until 100 years ago. And suppose the American Indians
claimed the "homeland" of which they were the sole, native, and
ancient
occupants until only some 450 years ago!


I am not being facetious. All these claims are just as valid?or just as
fantastic?as the Jewish "historic connection" with Palestine. Most
are more
valid. In any event, the great Moslem expansion about 650 AD finally
settled things. It dominated Palestine completely. From that day on,
Palestine was solidly Arabic in population, language, and religion. When
British armies entered the country during the last war, they found 500,000
Arabs and only 65,000 Jews.


If solid, uninterrupted Arab occupation for nearly 1,300 years does not
make a country "Arab", what does?


The Jews say, and rightly, that Palestine is the home of their religion. It
is likewise the birthplace of Christianity, but would any Christian nation
claim it on that account? In passing, let me say that the Christian
Arabs?and there are many hundreds of thousands of them in the Arab
World?are in absolute agreement with all other Arabs in opposing the
Zionist invasion of Palestine.


May I also point out that Jerusalem is, after Mecca and Medina, the holiest
place in Islam. In fact, in the early days of our religion, Moslems prayed
toward Jerusalem instead of Mecca. The Jewish "religious claim" to
Palestine is as absurd as the "historic claim." The Holy Places,
sacred to
three great religions, must be open to all, the monopoly of none. Let us
not confuse religion and politics.


We are told that we are inhumane and heartless because do not accept with
open arms the perhaps 200,000 Jews in Europe who suffered so frightfully
under Nazi cruelty, and who even now?almost three years after war's
end?still languish in cold, depressing camps. Let me underline several
facts. The unimaginable persecution of the Jews was not done by the Arabs:
it was done by a Christian nation in the West. The war which ruined Europe
and made it almost impossible for these Jews to rehabilitate themselves was
fought by the Christian nations of the West. The rich and empty portions of
the earth belong, not to the Arabs, but to the Christian nations of the
West.


And yet, to ease their consciences, these Christian nations of the West are
asking Palestine?a poor and tiny Moslem country of the East?to accept the
entire burden. "We have hurt these people terribly," cries the West
to the
East. "Won't you please take care of them for us?" We find
neither logic
nor justice in this. Are we therefore "cruel and heartless
nationalists" ?
We are a generous people: we are proud that "Arab hospitality" is a
phrase
famous throughout the world. We are a humane people: no one was shocked
more than we by the Hitlerite terror. No one pities the present plight of
the desperate European Jews more than we. But we say that Palestine has
already sheltered 600,000 refugees. We believe that is enough to expect of
us?even too much. We believe it is now the turn of the rest of the world to
accept some of them.


I will be entirely frank with you. There is one thing the Arab world simply
cannot understand. Of all the nations of the earth, America is most
insistent that something be done for these suffering Jews of Europe. This
feeling does credit to the humanity for which America is famous, and to
that glorious inscription on your Statue of Liberty. And yet this same
America?the richest, greatest, most powerful nation the world has ever
known?refuses to accept more than a token handful of these same Jews
herself! I hope you will not think I am being bitter about this. I have
tried hard to understand that mysterious paradox, and I confess I cannot.
Nor can any other Arab.


Perhaps you have been informed that "the Jews in Europe want to go to no
other place except Palestine." This myth is one of the greatest propaganda
triumphs of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, the organisation which
promotes with fanatic zeal the emigration to Palestine. It is a subtle
half-truth, thus doubly dangerous. The astounding truth is that nobody on
earth really knows where these unfortunate Jews really want to go! You
would think that in so grave a problem, the American, British, and other
authorities responsible for the European Jews would have made a very
careful survey, probably by vote, to find out where each Jew actually wants
to go. Amazingly enough this has never been done! The Jewish Agency has
prevented it.


Some time ago the American Military Governor in Germany was asked at a
press conference how he was so certain that all Jews there wanted to go to
Palestine. His answer was simple: "My Jewish advisors tell me so." He
admitted no poll had ever been made. Preparations were indeed begun for
one, but the Jewish Agency stepped in to stop it. The truth is that the
Jews in German camps are now subjected to a Zionist pressure campaign which
learned much from the Nazi terror. It is dangerous for a Jew to say that he
would rather go to some other country, not Palestine. Such dissenters have
been severely beaten, and worse.


Not long ago, in Palestine, nearly 1,000 Austrian Jews informed the
international refugee organisation that they would like to go back to
Austria, and plans were made to repatriate them. The Jewish Agency heard of
this, and exerted enough political pressure to stop it. It would be bad
propaganda for Zionism if Jews began leaving Palestine. The nearly 1,000
Austrian are still there, against their will.


The fact is that most of the European Jews are Western in culture and
outlook, entirely urban in experience and habits. They cannot really have
their hearts set on becoming pioneers in the barren, arid, cramped land
which is Palestine. One thing, however, is undoubtedly true. As matters
stand now, most refugee Jews in Europe would, indeed, vote for Palestine,
simply because they know no other country will have them.


If you or I were given a choice between a near-prison camp for the rest of
our lives?or Palestine?we would both choose Palestine, too.


But open up any other alternative to them?give them any other choice, and
see what happens! No poll, however, will be worth anything unless the
nations of the earth are willing to open their doors?just a little?to the
Jews. In other words, if in such a poll a Jew says he wants to go to
Sweden, Sweden must be willing to accept him. If he votes for America, you
must let him come in.


Any other kind of poll would be a farce. For the desperate Jew, this is no
idle testing of opinion: this is a grave matter of life or death. Unless he
is absolutely sure that his vote means something, he will always vote for
Palestine, so as not to risk his bird in the hand for one in the bush. In
any event, Palestine can accept no more. The 65,000 Jews in Palestine in
1918 have jumped to 600,000 today. We Arabs have increased, too, but not by
immigration. The Jews were then a mere 11 per cent of our population. Today
they are one third of it.


The rate of increase has been terrifying. In a few more years?unless
stopped now?it will overwhelm us, and we shall be an important minority in
our own home. Surely the rest of the wide world is rich enough and generous
enough to find a place for 200,000 Jews?about one third the number that
tiny, poor Palestine has already sheltered. For the rest of the world, it
is hardly a drop in the bucket. For us it means national suicide.


We are sometimes told that since the Jews came to Palestine, the Arab
standard of living has improved. This is a most complicated question. But
let us even assume, for the argument, that it is true. We would rather be a
bit poorer, and masters of our own home. Is this unnatural? The sorry story
of the so-called "Balfour Declaration, " which started Zionist
immigration
into Palestine, is too complicated to repeat here in detail. It is grounded
in broken promises to the Arabs?promises made in cold print which admit no
denying.


We utterly deny its validity. We utterly deny the right of Great Britain to
give away Arab land for a "national home" for an entirely foreign
people.
Even the League of Nations sanction does not alter this. At the time, not a
single Arab state was a member of the League. We were not allowed to say a
word in our own defense.


I must point out, again in friendly frankness, that America was nearly as
responsible as Britain for this Balfour Declaration. President Wilson
approved it before it was issued, and the American Congress adopted it word
for word in a joint resolution on 30(superscript: th) June, 1922. In the
1920s, Arabs were annoyed and insulted by Zionist immigration, but not
alarmed by it. It was steady, but fairly small, as even the Zionist
founders thought it would remain. Indeed for some years, more Jews left
Palestine than entered it?in 1927 almost twice as many.


But two new factors, entirely unforeseen by Britain or the League or
America or the most fervent Zionist, arose in the early thirties to raise
the immigration to undreamed heights. One was the World Depression; the
second the rise of Hitler. In 1932, the year before Hitler came to power,
only 9,500 Jews came to Palestine. We did not welcome them, but we were not
afraid that, at that rate, our solid Arab majority would ever be in danger.


But the next year?the year of Hitler?it jumped to 30,000! In 1934 it was
42,000! In 1935 it reached 61,000! It was no longer the orderly arrival of
idealist Zionists. Rather, all Europe was pouring its frightened Jews upon
us. Then, at last, we, too, became frightened. We knew that unless this
enormous influx stopped, we were, as Arabs, doomed in our Palestine
homeland. And we have not changed our minds.


I have the impression that many Americans believe the trouble in Palestine
is very remote from them, that America had little to do with it, and that
your only interest now is that of a humane bystander. I believe that you do
not realise how directly you are, as a nation, responsible in general for
the whole Zionist move and specifically for the present terrorism. I call
this to your attention because I am certain that if you realise your
responsibility you will act fairly to admit it and assume it.


Quite aside from official American support for the "National Home" of
the
Balfour Declaration, the Zionist settlements in Palestine would have been
almost impossible, on anything like the current scale, without American
money. This was contributed by American Jewry in an idealistic effort to
help their fellows. The motive was worthy: the result were disastrous. The
contributions were by private individuals, but they were almost entirely
Americans, and, as a nation, only America can answer for it.


The present catastrophe may be laid almost entirely at your door. Your
government, almost alone in the world, is insisting on the immediate
admission of 100,000 more Jews into Palestine?to be followed by countless
additional ones. This will have the most frightful consequences in bloody
chaos beyond anything ever hinted at in Palestine before.


It is your press and political leadership, almost alone in the world, who
press this demand. It is almost entirely American money which hires or buys
the "refugee ships" that steam illegally toward Palestine: American
money
which pays their crews. The illegal immigration from Europe is arranged by
the Jewish Agency, supported almost entirely by American funds. It is
American dollars which support the terrorists, which buy the bullets and
pistols that kill British soldiers?your allies?and Arab citizens?your
friends.


We in the Arab world were stunned to hear that you permit open
advertisements in newspapers asking for money to finance these terrorists,
to arm them openly and deliberately for murder. We could not believe this
could really happen in the modern world. Now we must believe it: we have
seen the advertisements with our own eyes. I point out these things because
nothing less than complete frankness will be of use. The crisis is too
stark for mere polite vagueness which means nothing.


I have the most complete confidence in the fair-mindedness and generosity
of the American public. We Arabs ask no favours. We ask only that you know
the full truth, not half of it. We ask only that when you judge the
Palestine question, you put yourselves in our place.


What would your answer be if some outside agency told you that you must
accept in America many millions of utter strangers in your midst?enough to
dominate your country?merely because they insisted on going to America, and
because their forefathers had once lived there some 2,000 years ago?


Our answer is the same.


And what would be your action if, in spite of your refusal, this outside
agency began forcing them on you?


Ours will be the same.

3 Comments
Comment deleted at the request of the author.
Add a Comment